The ruling bars the commission from regulating certain kinds of web traffic, saying it lacks the statutory authority.
In response, organizations based in New York are adopting new organizing strategies and tactics to help the FCC grow new teeth. And a pro-FCC resolution that the New York City Council has been considering adopting since 2007 is being revived.
The Tuesday ruling means Internet and mobile service providers will be able to censor information they don't want subscribers to see and slow down information they believe uses too much bandwidth. They could also force website operators who want faster service to pay more for it. Such a change could dramatically increase the costs of operating the city's independent media outlets, which until now, have relied on the Internet's low startup and operational costs to remain afloat.
"The Internet is the first opportunity to do the kind of work we do," says Kristofer Rios, policy program associate withPeople's Production House, a non-profit that trains New York youth and community based reporters to do radio journalism. "It's a setback. Now, in addition to paying for the Internet service, they may have to pay for every post they put up, for every email you send out."
The Tuesday ruling could also mean the FCC doesn't have the authority to implement its ambitious National Broadband Plan, which aims to bridge the digital divide. Without broad powers to regulate broadband, agency officials say they aren't sure they can accelerate broadband access and adoption in rural America and connect low-income Americans, Native American communities, and Americans with disabilities.
Households without Internet access will find it increasingly hard to participate in the economy. About half of all New York households had no Internet access at home in 2007, according to City Council-sponsored research.
Dana Spiegel, executive director of NYCwireless, a non-profit that that advocates and enables the growth of free, public wireless Internet access in New York City and surrounding areas, says the cost of Internet service blocks access for low-income people. "$50 bucks a month for Internet service, plus tariffs and all that is expensive. It's about $2 per day. That's a meal," Spiegel says." If you have a choice between eating and having Internet access, you'd choose to eat and rightfully so."
The New York Times reported Tuesday that Comcast and other large Internet providers don’t currently restrict web content and have no plans to do so. Local advocates scoffed at the claim. "What's to stop them from doing it?" Rios asks.
Spiegel agrees. "The incentive for them to do such a thing? There are millions of them," he says. "Their incentives not to do it are very few."



